Looming Court Decision Could Hasten Pop Of Student Loan Bubble

A federal case now under consideration in the First Circuit Court of Appeals  could have huge ramifications for millions of Americans buried under student loan debt, as well as lenders and US taxpayers.

student loan

Bloomberg reports Robert Murphy is closer than ever to victory:

The unemployed 65-year-old, acting as his own attorney, spent three years appealing his way to the Boston federal court that is now considering his case. A win for Murphy would relieve him of hundreds of thousands of dollars in student debt—and could fundamentally change the way U.S. bankruptcy courts handle borrowers who can't repay college loans.”

In most cases, federal rules put in place in the 1970s make it next to impossible to discharge student loan debt through bankruptcy. Anyone hoping to do so must prove “undue hardship,” something Congress never defined.

Emery University Law Professor Rafael Pardo wrote a brief in Murphy's case. He said if the court creates a more lenient standard, it would make it much easier for desperate borrowers to earn a reprieve from student debt:

Creditors have been able to stack the deck in their favor as they have litigated what undue hardship means.”

This has contributed to the student loan bubble we see today. According to Bloomberg, a single loan servicer holds a monopoly on and works tirelessly behind the scenes to keep student loan debt out of the bankruptcy equation.

Through a loan servicer called ECMC, the Department of Education has spent several years battling student borrowers who want bankruptcy relief. ECMC, which has an exclusive agreement with the government, has aggressively advocated that judges use the harsh standards to decide when it's appropriate to forgive student debt.”

As we reported last month, even without the possibility of discharging student loans through bankruptcy, the student loan default rate has blasted through the roof. According to figures released by the White House, about 73% of college loans are being repaid. That means about 27% are not, far more than double the 11.3% the reported last year.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
No tags for this post.

Related posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *