We know that teens take risks, but we may not know why or that this tendency can continue even to our thirties. This is important for parents who waste much breath—and for growing money, too.
A recent New Yorker article presents the two dominant neuroscience theories for why teens embrace risk. Neurologist Frances Jensen asserts that the electric lines from all over the brain to the frontal lobe are not fully developed until our twenties or even thirties. The frontal lobe is the center of planning, self-awareness, and judgment, so if it doesn't receive enough impulses, it can't exercise those functions to override poor decisions. The young aren't heedless; they simply lack proper wiring.
The second is Laurence Steinberg's theory that the pleasure center, the nucleus accumbens, grows from childhood to its maximum size in our teens and declines thereafter. Therefore at puberty our dopamine receptors, which signal pleasure, multiply. He says this is why nothing ever feels as good again as when we are teens, whether listening to music, being with friends, or other things not printable in a family newspaper. He maintains that teens are no “worse than their elders at assessing danger. It's just that the potential rewards seem—and from a neurological standpoint, genuinely are—way greater.” Teen brains balance risk and reward and choose the greater risk for greater potential reward.
But if the young are wired to enjoy now, when the rewards seem greater, they may miss the key element of growing money: time. Money is wet snow rolling down a hill. The money snowball grows larger the longer the hill. Ergo, the younger you are, the longer your hill, the more money you will have.
Take Jo and Joe. Each of them saves the same amount but Jo starts at 21 and Joe at 40. Each increases savings each year at the same rate earns the same return. Joe's savings never catch up to Jo's; they remain 19 years behind hers forever. In fact, Jo could stop saving and investing at age 40 and Joe wouldn't have the same amount until he's 59:
