I keep replaying a recent conversation about risk in my head. You know how it is. Someone says something that does not make sense and you ponder why he or she fails to see what is obvious to you (and to many others). Let me explain.

The speaker (whom I will call Bill) asserted that concerns on the part of an unnamed fiduciary about the risks associated with investing in a particular structured product should be given short shrift. He reasoned that no explicit losses had occurred during a date range certain so why bother with thinking about a “what if” world. According to his logic, anticipatory hedging or other type of risk control methodology would be counterproductive.

I could not disagree more with the view that no news is good news. 

Any competent risk professional will describe the nature of an effective mitigation program as forward-looking. Sometimes a review of past failures can be helpful in terms of understanding what could have been done differently. That's not to say that history dictates the future. Change occurs and ignoring new rules or market conditions or other salient facts makes little sense.

Effective risk management is a process that includes steps such as those listed below:

Textbooks and “lessons learned” white papers are replete with examples of what might have been done in advance to avoid past monetary loss or untimely death or injury. Notably, the concept of loss is not confined to negative outcomes. Opportunity loss is likewise important. A dictionary defines the term as “loss of availability,” “loss of prospective benefit,” “loss of readiness” or “loss of productivity.”